Decide it once.
The reasons stay.
A chat window gives you an answer and forgets it by Friday. Wavn keeps the decision - what you chose, what was argued against it, what is still open - cited against your own files, and brings it back on the date you set. Then it builds the work the decision demands.
No account needed to ask. Sign in to keep what you decide.
You talk. You decide. The work comes back.
Each stop is built from the one before it: the decision comes out of the conversation you actually had, and the work comes out of the decision. One example:
“Lease or buy the 2,000 sqm harbour-district warehouse? We have the cash reserve, but it locks up 60% of liquid runway.”
Rent at projected escalation crosses purchase cost in year four. Both options assume 20% year-on-year pallet throughput; if volume dips 8%, the holding costs create a cash squeeze. Price the exit first.
Sounds like a decision: lease the harbour-district warehouse rather than buy it. Locked with what was argued against it, what is still open, and a date to look again. You can always say it is not a decision.
The comparison as a spreadsheet, the case as a document, the board update as a deck - built from the decision and the material you attached, not from a blank prompt.
An illustration, not a customer. The conversation, the record and the files are real: see how it works.
Three things a chat window cannot do.
It notices when you have decided
A chat window never knows a decision happened.
When a conversation settles something, Wavn says what it heard and asks whether to record it. You can always say it is not a decision. It proposes; you decide. Nothing reaches the record without your hand.
It cites the line, not the vibe
Every claim points at a line in your own material.
Attach contracts, balance sheets, historical data. Wavn cites the exact lines it read, and says out loud when your material does not support an assumption, instead of filling the gap with something plausible.
The record keeps its dissent
Decisions that do not die in a scroll.
A locked decision holds who objected, what stayed contested, and the conditions that would reopen it. Origin is never rewritten: a changed decision keeps every version and the reason it changed. When the conditions change, the reasoning is still there to read.
Built for the people whose decisions carry the downside.
Not every question needs a record. These do, because in a year someone will ask why, and the person who objected may have left.
Founders & capital allocators
- The decision
- Runway, the acquisition, the senior hire that is hard to unwind.
- The downside
- The board asks why in twelve months and the chat is gone.
- You leave with
- The decision locked with its dissent, the model as a live spreadsheet, the board memo as a document.
General counsel & law firm principals
- The decision
- The clause to concede, the dispute to settle, the exposure nobody has priced.
- The downside
- Advice that cannot show which line of the contract it rests on.
- You leave with
- Every claim cited to a line in the document you attached, and a record of what was contested.
Private equity & strategy
- The decision
- The diligence assumption the whole deck rests on.
- The downside
- An exit model nobody can defend when the assumption moves.
- You leave with
- The assumption held as still open, a date to re-test it, and the comparison rebuilt when it changes.
Engineering leadership
- The decision
- The architecture bet, build-versus-buy, the migration that cannot be half-done.
- The downside
- The design review is forty screens up in a channel that no longer exists.
- You leave with
- The decision record - the option taken, the option not taken, and why - that the next engineer reads instead of asking you.
Bring the decision you have to make. Leave with it made, on the record.
Free to start. Conversations and locked decisions are never counted, on any plan.